Translate
IBU
Consol
|
|
How To Choose A Good Returning Officer To Run A Proper GEA
Election
Introduction
I offer the following advice as a starting point for GEA
Committee members to read & discuss with each other,
before appointing Returning Officers.
Why Do I Do This ? Who Am I To Suggest This ?
- I, Julian H. Stacey, have run several annual elections for
the GEA committee, & have before & since seen some
Returning Officers do a good job, & other Returning
Officers do a poor or rotten job.
- As some of both good & rotten Returning Officers
have been appointed by committees more than once, it seems
likely some GEA committee members over the years have had
little or no idea what criteria to use when selecting &
appointing a _Good_ Returning Officer to run the annual
elections [hence I wrote these suggested guidelines].
- I also have some relevant experience outside the GEA:-
I chaired the University of Kent At Canterbury Student
Union Standing Orders Committee for over a year around
1979/80, where we ran numerous elections for constituencies
varying between 1000 & 4000 electors, with over 1500 or
2500 ballots counted for the annual executive &
sabbatical elections alone.)
- Whilst we should perhaps not take our little GEA social
& sports club elections too seriously, democracy in
general is ill served & under-mined when for no good
reason, groups permit elections to descend to un-verifiable
results requiring blind faith.
- My guess is it's likely also a breach of German law for
any Verein, whether registered or not, to deliberately
suppress the numeric results of an annual election for the
Vorstand.
Aim
- There are always some in an electorate who don't know
& or don't particularly want to trust any particular
returning officer.
- One can & should exclude the possibility of any one
person having the possibility to be suspected of irregular
behaviour.
- So use procedures that makes an election provably fair,
& impossible for any one single individual to be capable
of undetected un-trustworthy practice.
- Correct open procedure protects the returning officer
& assistants from suspicion, & the electorate have no
need to trust any one individual running the election.
- Incorrect non-open procedures IE secretive counting &
suppressed numeric results, arouse suspicion, & are an
abuse of & imposition upon the electorate, who then have
no option but to challenge the election, if they want to
ascertain if the election might have been fair.
- The election process should not merely be fair, but be
seen to be _Provably_ fair. "Vertauen ist Gut, Kontrol ist
besser" applies. `Glasnost` applies: Complete openness
(except in voting booth !)
- It is foolish to accept or permit electoral methods that
require the electorate to have to trust a Returning Officer,
when more open methods can ensure _provable_ fairness.
- Anyone who accepts authority over the electorate in being
Returning Officer, owes the electorate the duty to perform to
a good standard, & must be prepared to accept concomitant
public scrutiny &/or criticism.
- GEA election procedures should avoid being so sub
standard they would be condemned by such as the Electoral
Reform Society, &/or Real (geographicly appointed)
returning officers.
Criteria To Select A Returning Officer
- Appointing a returning officer is not about soothing
egos, choosing a friend, or someone committee members
personally trust etc. It is about choosing a returning
officer who can deliver the electorate a _provably_ honest
& correct election; not accepting someone the committee
merely _hopes_ might run a fair election.
- Any prospective returning officer who advocates secret
counting & suppressed numeric results should be regarded
as suspect, & motives questioned as to why they propose
to deny the electorate their right to a provably fair
election.
- The committee should also beware appointing a returning
officer who is likely to deliberately breach German law,
(that I guess covers election procedures for Vereins, whether
registered or not)
- The first person to be suggested or volunteer at a
committee meeting is not necessarily the best person to run
the election.
- A retiring committee member is Not a good choice:
`Befangenheit', decline their offer, & suggest they
instead could apply to run the election a year later,
allowing time to become a more neutral election
official.
- The boy/ girl friend/ spouse/ brother/ sister, boss/
employee/ business partner etc of a candidate is not a good
choice: (Potential bias for or against, if not actual, that
could be suspected by some)
- A competent organiser is needed, there's plenty to forget
or do wrong, unless well organised.
- A strong character is helpful, some years there is
considerable pressure / problems from any/ all of candidates,
some committee members &/or normal membership.
- The committee should interview prospective returning
officers, to determine who would do a _good_ job. (Some years
the committee announces publicly in the programme, that those
interested/ willing to run the elections should make
themselves known, thus ensuring a wider selection of
potential returning officer.)
- The Returning Officer must be independent & has total
responsibility for & control of the elections, the
committee individually & together must have no formal say
(except suggestions) in the running of the election, except
that a quorate committee can appoint & sack the Returning
Officer.
Conduct Of The Election
- Running the election is not about the returning officer
having a good time, When the returning officer sets him/
herself over the electorate, the returning officer owes the
electorate to do the _provably_ fairest job possible: not
adopt procedures that force the electorate to choose between
blind trust & wondering if the election might or might
not be fair.
- The returning officer should assume there is at least one
person in the electorate who does not trust him/ her, &
some others who may be doubtful, & do everything
scrupulously, so that no one has any chance for doubt. To
require blind faith of the electorate is an abuse of the
electorate.
- The returning officer shall prepare & bring ballot
papers of a format not known (ie not reproducible) to at
least one deputy.
- That deputy shall bring a rubber stamp & pad of shape
& colour unknown to the returning officer. At no time
does deputy give rubber stamp to returning officer.
- Any ballot form not bearing the rubber stamp will be
invalid - thus no single person can be suspected of stuffing
the ballot.
- [Optional - To be decided sometime _before_
balloting starts, & particularly important when we have
less candidates than posts available] :
Anyone with less than 10% of the ballot is not elected
(normally approx 5 or 6 votes - this to keep out complete
no-hopers - remember our unusually open, non selective, total
lack of any club membership/ entry criteria ... so we are
open to more than our share of weirdos! ... but they can't
raise more than a few votes usually)
- The returning officer turns our lockable ballot box
turned upside down, & shows it empty at commencement of
ballot & announcement is made that balloting has started.
(A little theatre done right, amuses & interests the
electorate in voting).
- [Optional Ballot paper or Returning officer could
suggest to voters: "Suggestion: Think first, then vote only
for people you believe would make _Good_ committee members.
Voting for people you have merely met once or twice &
know nothing else about, may not elect the best
candidates."
- Voters should vote in secret in the voting booth that
must be provided by Returning Officer (often a giant plastic
bag taped to table & held to ceiling with string).
- Returning officer announces ballot closed, & invites
witnesses to escort box up stairs to counting area.
- Returning officer recruits counters from a wide selection
of GEA members, not just his/ her personal friends. Even
recruit people you are on bad terms with ! An electorate that
knows your count is certified even by people you don't get on
with, is an electorate certain that the vote is totally fair
!
- Votes are publicly counted, no attempt is made to prevent
anyone observing numeric count done by teams of 2, with
returning officer presiding, not counting, public can lodge
requests for clarity with returning officer, only returning
officer to talk to counters.
- Returning Officer makes No Attempt to hide or keep secret
numeric count at any stage.
- 2 or more counters/ deputies at table co sign duplicate
copies of the finally tally, & retain these personal
verification copies.
- Ballot papers are returned to locked ballot box in case
of later recount/ challenge (got to put them somewhere to
keep it tidy anyway).
- Returning officer goes downstairs in company of some
counters, one of whom has a spare tally to check announcement
against), & announces numeric results in alphabetic
(ballot paper) name order; Then summarises with 2nd shorter
list of people elected. (Thus at no time do we explicitly
announce the name of `losers') Returning officer thanks all
candidates, particularly those (un-named) who have not been
elected this time, & thanks them for increasing the
candidate number sufficient to make it a real election.
(Returning officer might also congratulate them on escaping
duty this year, or wishing them luck for next year,
whatever).
- Returning officer sticks numeric results on notice board,
& forwards to email/ web & GEA programme
compiler.
- Returning officer co-ordinates with old GEA secretary re
next booked committee venue, & may preside at 1st meeting
of new committee, 1st & only order of business that the
returning officer chairs, being committee choice of a new
chair. (Sometimes they're not ready to choose, so get them to
appoint a temporary chair just for the first meeting). Hand
over list of names phones & emails of committee members,
(particularly any absent) from nomination forms, & leave
:-)
Further Suggestions
I welcome suggestions for changes to this
http://www.berklix.com/gea/elections.html particularly if it's
emailed in Ascii ready to cut & paste into this existing
document. It was written quickly, there's doubtless room for
improvement.
Last edited on or after: Sat Feb 3 18:12:05 CET 2001
|